|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Giorgio (deneb
unixwave.org)Date: Sun Jun 24 2001 - 14:24:44 CDT
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> This is true. However, we're talking about the merrits of the programming
> languages. Neither Perl nor C/C++ are very good for security. Perl is good
> for rapid prototyping, C is good for high performance, and C++ is good for
> bloating your C programs :-) Java is a much stronger contender for secure
> programs, primarily because it is type safe. ML and Haskall would be some
> other strong contenders for secure programming languages, but there are many
> practical problems with trying to develop deployable apps in narrowly-supported
> languages.
I think that you forgot Python.
bye,
deneb
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]