|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Locking down a Sun box
From: Martin Hepworth (martin.hepworth
BLACKWELLSBOOKSHOPS.CO.UK)Date: Thu Jun 15 2000 - 09:58:58 CDT
- Next message: Scott D. Yelich: "Sunscreen vs ipf"
- Previous message: Lance Spitzner: "Re: Solaris 2.8, was Locking down a Sun box"
- Maybe in reply to: Mike Tatroe: "Locking down a Sun box"
- Next in thread: Amos Gouaux: "Re: Locking down a Sun box"
- Maybe reply: Martin Hepworth: "Re: Locking down a Sun box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Moran [mailto:tony
AYAHUASCA.NET]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 2:56 PM
> To: FOCUS-SUN
SECURITYFOCUS.COM
> Subject: Re: Locking down a Sun box
>
>
> Martin Hepworth said:
>
> > IMHO you problem will be NT and IIS :-) (personally I'd run
> OpenBSD as the
> > web server, but thats just a personal choice)
>
>
> Over and above Solaris ? For what reasons out of interest ?
a low en pentium can do alot of statisc web serving (or even off loading the
stuff to a big SUN box), its got more hardware support then solaris on x86,
its well audited code, and is blisteringly fast is secure out of the box.
Like I say just persomal preference. Solaris 8 is worth considering, but
I've not used on older kit that I like to reuse for web-servers etc.
> I have heard
> that the OpenBSD Group are extremely fast to respond to
> issues like bugs
> and newly discovered vulnerabilities.
>
all the 'free' *nix groups are, the recent Linux 2.2 kernal problem was
fixed aa couple of hours after it was first reported.
> Also what does the list think of Solaris 8 ? Is it worth an
> all 2.6 shop
> even investigating..? Personaly I let sleeping dogs lie but
> others here
> are champing at the bit to try it out.
>
As soon as all our 3rd party software is certified on Sol 8 we'll move....
martin
DISCLAIMER
This e-mail contains information which is strictly confidential to the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient please note that any copying, use or dissemination of the contents of this e-mail is prohibited and unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the Sender to arrange for its return.
The information, images, documents and views expressed in this e-mail are personal to the Sender and do not expressly or implicitly represent official positions and policies of Blackwell's and are given entirely without prejudice and subject to contract.
- Next message: Scott D. Yelich: "Sunscreen vs ipf"
- Previous message: Lance Spitzner: "Re: Solaris 2.8, was Locking down a Sun box"
- Maybe in reply to: Mike Tatroe: "Locking down a Sun box"
- Next in thread: Amos Gouaux: "Re: Locking down a Sun box"
- Maybe reply: Martin Hepworth: "Re: Locking down a Sun box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]