|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: linux v. solaris
From: dbell (dbell
BWAY.NET)Date: Thu Jun 15 2000 - 17:00:35 CDT
- Next message: David McCall: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Previous message: Gerhard den Hollander: "Re: sun support / linux ??"
- Next in thread: David McCall: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: David McCall: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: Hugo Fortier: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: Adam Morley: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: Darren Moffat - Solaris Sustaining Engineering: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: Robert G. Ferrell: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Can we PLEASE not have a flame-war about support levels. I don't think
it's really on-topic here (just my opinion). If we just have to open that
can of worms, let's talk about where response to security holes is better:
in the open-source world, or through Sun and why...
-- Daniel Bell Heuer's Law: Any feature is a bug unless it can be turned off.
- Next message: David McCall: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Previous message: Gerhard den Hollander: "Re: sun support / linux ??"
- Next in thread: David McCall: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: David McCall: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: Hugo Fortier: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: Adam Morley: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: Darren Moffat - Solaris Sustaining Engineering: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Reply: Robert G. Ferrell: "Re: linux v. solaris"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]