|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: X security
From: Walsh, Andrew (Andrew_Walsh
ASC.AON.COM)Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 13:15:15 CDT
- Next message: David LaPorte: "Re: ssh2"
- Previous message: Clayton Mitchell: "Re: rootless NIS passwd maps"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul B. Henson: "X security"
- Maybe reply: Walsh, Andrew: "Re: X security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>Modifying the code is only good if you have the time to maintain it.
>>Personally, I don't have the time. As for running with just a TCP port, I
>>prefer to run VNC so it doesn't open a TCP port and connect locally through an
>>SSH tunnel.
>
>Xnest supports the "-pn" option. Why doesn't VNC?
Xvnc does support the -pn option. I just tested it and it works fine. Thanks
for pointing it out, I think this is probably the best way to run VNC. You may
get better performance running the VNC client on the same host if you had a
socket, but I'll take the performance hit over mucking with permissions or
changing the code.
ajw
#include <personal_opinion.h>
- Next message: David LaPorte: "Re: ssh2"
- Previous message: Clayton Mitchell: "Re: rootless NIS passwd maps"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul B. Henson: "X security"
- Maybe reply: Walsh, Andrew: "Re: X security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]