|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Andrew Jenks (ajenks
microsoft.com)Date: Sun Oct 28 2001 - 12:31:30 CST
FYI, Phone-line speed connections are far and away the most dominant
now. That's not expect to changes for the next 10 years, when it's
predicted they'll drop to 49% of all net connections (they'll still be
the most numerous type of connection, though). Cable and DSL are really
small slices of the total market now.
-----Original Message-----
From: bacano [mailto:bacano
esoterica.pt]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 3:53 AM
To: webappsec
securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Thought you would find these stats interesting ....
I think that Windows users just prefer IE. The 15Mb download problem, is
still a problem for any Windows user who what's to have the latest IE
upgrade/version.
For example, if my Windows came by default with IE 5.0, to upgrade to
5.5
and then to 6.0 that 15(-20)Mb upgrade was needed 2 times.
Also, 56kb connection may be is not the standard anymore, with so many
cable
and DSL users, so big d/l's are not the problem they use to be.
[ ]'s bacano
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry Suskind" <pr1mos
yahoo.com>
To: <webappsec
securityfocus.com>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: Thought you would find these stats interesting ....
> Not suprising at all.
>
> 1. Since Win95 OSR2, IE has come standard. Netscape you have to go
> get.
>
> 2. How many people will tolerate a 15MB download over a 56kb
> connection?
>
> 3. Since AOL bought Netscape, many of their developers left. It was
> far too long for Netscape 6.0 to come out, when it finally did, it
> was a buggy mess. Took another bunch of time before Netscape 6.x was
> usable.
>
> 4. Now, almost 4 years later, it is sort of "what's netscape"?
>
> 5. Many of the people that did have Netscape, and it was probably
> 4.x, have all replaced their systems (about a 3 year life span). Once
> you get a new system, it has a browser so why bother getting another
> one (see number 2)?
>
> 6. IE 5.0 worked better than Netscape 4.x did. Even people that don't
> like Microsoft and used Netscape as a statement for not being for the
> evil empire wained in the frustration of using a browser that had
> issues.
>
> Is there anything I am missing?
>
>
>
>
>
> =====
> ---
> Barry Suskind
> pr1mos
yahoo.com
> If it weren't for change, my job would be to grease the corporate
abacus
rods.....
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com
>
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]