OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Andrew Jenks (ajenksmicrosoft.com)
Date: Sun Oct 28 2001 - 12:31:30 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    FYI, Phone-line speed connections are far and away the most dominant
    now. That's not expect to changes for the next 10 years, when it's
    predicted they'll drop to 49% of all net connections (they'll still be
    the most numerous type of connection, though). Cable and DSL are really
    small slices of the total market now.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: bacano [mailto:bacanoesoterica.pt]
    Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 3:53 AM
    To: webappsecsecurityfocus.com
    Subject: Re: Thought you would find these stats interesting ....

    I think that Windows users just prefer IE. The 15Mb download problem, is
    still a problem for any Windows user who what's to have the latest IE
    upgrade/version.
    For example, if my Windows came by default with IE 5.0, to upgrade to
    5.5
    and then to 6.0 that 15(-20)Mb upgrade was needed 2 times.
    Also, 56kb connection may be is not the standard anymore, with so many
    cable
    and DSL users, so big d/l's are not the problem they use to be.

    [ ]'s bacano

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Barry Suskind" <pr1mosyahoo.com>
    To: <webappsecsecurityfocus.com>
    Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:15 PM
    Subject: Re: Thought you would find these stats interesting ....

    > Not suprising at all.
    >
    > 1. Since Win95 OSR2, IE has come standard. Netscape you have to go
    > get.
    >
    > 2. How many people will tolerate a 15MB download over a 56kb
    > connection?
    >
    > 3. Since AOL bought Netscape, many of their developers left. It was
    > far too long for Netscape 6.0 to come out, when it finally did, it
    > was a buggy mess. Took another bunch of time before Netscape 6.x was
    > usable.
    >
    > 4. Now, almost 4 years later, it is sort of "what's netscape"?
    >
    > 5. Many of the people that did have Netscape, and it was probably
    > 4.x, have all replaced their systems (about a 3 year life span). Once
    > you get a new system, it has a browser so why bother getting another
    > one (see number 2)?
    >
    > 6. IE 5.0 worked better than Netscape 4.x did. Even people that don't
    > like Microsoft and used Netscape as a statement for not being for the
    > evil empire wained in the frustration of using a browser that had
    > issues.
    >
    > Is there anything I am missing?
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > =====
    > ---
    > Barry Suskind
    > pr1mosyahoo.com
    > If it weren't for change, my job would be to grease the corporate
    abacus
    rods.....
    >
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
    > http://personals.yahoo.com
    >