OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Bruce.Morrisernstyoung.com.au
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 22:17:56 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    This email is to be read subject to the disclaimer below.

    Security Test planning
    1. What do I want to achieve from testing (what level of assurance)?
    2. What are the risks I want to address through this testing (sources and
    methods)?
    3. What perspectives do I need to achieve this?
    4. From each perspective:
         What access levels exist within each perspective (functional and
    security management)?
         What application processes or security functions are available at this
    level
         Document classes of inputs (what should be allowed, what shouldn't be
    allowed)
         Document associated expected/desired outputs for each process (what
    should happen based on positive and negative inputs)
         Check does this address all possible paths through the relevant
    process based on the security design (testing of lower level access against
    higher level functions - sought of regression testing)?
         What information should be captured, how and who should have access on
    what basis (don't forget the detective controls in the environment)?

    Functionally testing of the security architecture should address:
    - legislative constraints (such as auditability, compliance, privacy,
    independence/securities, evidence/investigations, crimes, etc)
    - business constraints (such as segregation of duties, authentication,
    non-repudiation, contractual, government regulations)
    - business requirements (data and program integrity and availability,
    authentication)

                                                                                                                       
                        The Owasp
                        Project To: webappsecsecurityfocus.com
                        <owaspowasp. cc:
                        org> Subject: Planning a test
                                                                                                                       
                        22/01/2002
                        02:23 PM
                        Please
                        respond to
                        owasp
                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                       

    We have captured most of the dicsussion last week
    (white-box vs black box etc) although not yet got it
    up in the site. Give us a few weeks, things very
    hectic. So far I think we have a good first draft of
    most of the Why test ? What to test ? and How to
    test ? with an exception about how to plan a test. I
    know how I do it (paying special attention to legal
    contracts, project plans, permissions, laws etc) but
    it would be really good if other people share how
    they plan a test.

    We will get this first section written up by mid-Feb
    (with some details about Attack Trees so they can be
    used in descriptions) and we can then start the
    technical details about testing for specifics like
    cross site scripting etc

    So how do you plan a test ?

    --------------------
    NOTICE - This communication contains information which is confidential and
    the copyright of Ernst & Young or a third party.

    If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete
    and destroy all copies and telephone Ernst & Young on 1800 655 717
    immediately. If you are the intended recipient of this communication you
    should not copy, disclose or distribute this communication without the
    authority of Ernst & Young.

    Any views expressed in this Communication are those of the individual
    sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
    Ernst & Young.

    Except as required at law, Ernst & Young does not represent, warrant and/or
    guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor
    that the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or
    interference.

    Liability limited by the Accountants Scheme, approved under the
    Professional Standards Act 1994 (NSW)
    --------------------