From: Richard M. Smith (rmscomputerbytesman.com)
Date: Fri Oct 14 2005 - 10:13:33 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I believe that Microsoft first came up with the cross-site scripting name.
They wrote a paper on the subject around 2002.

"Script injection" does sound like a more descriptive and accurate name.

Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:Jeff.RobertsonDigitalInsight.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:55 AM
To: 'Reynolds, Jake'; Chris Varenhorst; Akash
Cc: webappsecsecurityfocus.com
Subject: RE: myspace hack

The name "XSS" does not make sense in a lot of its applications.

What "Stored XSS" and "Reflected XSS" have in common is the injection of
script into places where script wasn't supposed to be. Having more than one
site be involved is not the factor. What has been discussed in this thread
seems to me like it falls under "Stored XSS".

It would make more sense if this was called "script injection", but for some
reason the whole family was named XSS.

Who the heck names these things, anyway?

Jeff Robertson
Manager of Web Application Security
Digital Insight

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reynolds, Jake [mailto:Jake.Reynoldsfishnetsecurity.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:30
> To: Chris Varenhorst; Akash
> Cc: webappsecsecurityfocus.com
> Subject: RE: myspace hack
>
>
> I wouldn't consider this an XSS attack. Where in the attack did
> information cross sites? This seems like it is an embedded XSS attack
> in that a malicious script was entered into a profile in hopes that
> victims would view and execute it. However, nothing was sent across
> sites via the script. The vulnerability was a lack of output
> validation in my opinion, which is the same vulnerability that an XSS
> attack would exploit. I don't know how you would classify the
> attack... Probably "self-replicating session riding". Yeah that has a
> nice FUD-factor to it.
>
>
> Jake Reynolds, CCIE, CCSP, MCSE, CCSA, JNCIA-FWV, CWNA Senior Security
> Engineer -- Consulting Services FishNet Security
>
> Phone: 816.421.6611
> Toll Free: 888.732.9406
> Fax: 816.421.6677
>
> http://www.fishnetsecurity.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Varenhorst [mailto:varencMIT.EDU]
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 8:39 AM
> To: Akash
> Cc: webappsecsecurityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: myspace hack
>
> Oh wow I'm wrong, I'm apparently thinking of current myspace bots
> which do as I described. It looks this was in fact made possible by
> an XSS vulnerability.
> Sorry
>
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Chris Varenhorst wrote:
>
> > This isn't hacking at all. (at least not what I'd call it) This is
> > writing a script to go through myspace IDs (which
> happen to be
> > squential) issuing friend requests to every one of them. To prevent
> > this, now myspace limits friend requests to a certain
> number per day.
> > Hope that covers it!
> >
> > -Chris
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Akash wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone has more technical details about how 1
> million accounts
> > got hacked in about 24 hours.
> >
> > This is the supposed confession of the hacker
> > http://fast.info/myspace/
> >
> > I currently studying for CEH and just finished reading about XSS. So
> > this is of special interest.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > akash
> >
>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]