|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue
From: Ralf Hildebrandt (R.Hildebrandt
tu-bs.de)Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 06:26:39 CST
- Next message: Erich Meier: "[snort] Livelock with "nocase""
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- In reply to: Max Vision: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Next in thread: CyberPsychotic: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Reply: CyberPsychotic: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 05:16:44PM -0800, Max Vision wrote:
> In particular, I think it would be interesting if this fellow is not on
> the uoregon.edu network (shown as 'a'). So then you have traffic that is
> a --> b
> where your network is neither a nor b. That pretty much leaves spoofing
> from the local segment... If the packet came from outside his net, then
> how on earth did it get routed there?
Because the destination address was a multicast address and thus routed by
our University's router?
-- Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandttu-bs.de> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb Sysadmins don't go to hell; we're already doing our time in purgatory.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Next message: Erich Meier: "[snort] Livelock with "nocase""
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- In reply to: Max Vision: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Next in thread: CyberPsychotic: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Reply: CyberPsychotic: "Re: [snort] Anybody got a clue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]