|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Erik Engberg (Erik.Engberg
cygate.se)Date: Tue Mar 20 2001 - 09:48:26 CST
(This has been up on the list before, hasnīt it?)
Anyway,
I have done tests of this with the TopLayer switch and it works great, even
loadbalancing 3-4 snorts and 3-4 [other IDS] for redundant detection.
If you want an alternative, Alteon layer-7 switches works just fine as well
(even better?), although they are not fully stateful and has a built in
stateful firewall as the TopLayer, they are a lot faster (more stable?) and
can handle a lot more load and work great for IDS load balancing. They may
be cheaper as well... Although the Toplayer switch has a lot more
luserfriendly windoze gui interface.
I would recommend the Toplayer product to most people and Alteon to the
high-demand proīs.
/Erik
>-----Original Message-----
>From: diphen
agitation.net [mailto:diphen
agitation.net]
>Sent: den 19 mars 2001 23:48
>To: Austad, Jay
>Cc: 'snort-users
lists.sourceforge.net'
>Subject: Re: [Snort-users] thoughts on load balancing snort boxen for
>high traffic links
>
>
>I asked Marty this question a while back - his recommendation
>was to use
>TopLayer switches and balance between a few different boxes.
>
>-g
>
>On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:26:35PM -0600, Austad, Jay wrote:
>> I originally sent this message to another list of people,
>but I think maybe
>> it's a good thing to post it here also:
>>
>> Ok, so I was thinking more on load balancing snort boxes for
>high traffic
>> links, and here's one idea I had, let me know if this sounds
>like it may
>> work:
>>
>> Say I have one box that sits and runs the following command:
>> tcpdump -i eth1 -<some_options> | ./splitter -b 10M -h
>> 10.1.1.1:9999,10.1.1.2:9999,10.1.1.3:9999 &
>>
>> Where the program "splitter" takes the tcpdump output as
>stdin, fills a
>> buffer of size specified by the -b option, and then flushes
>the buffer
>> (UDP?) to the first host listed in the -h option, the next
>fill/flush will
>> go to the second host, and so on.
>>
>> Each snort box has it's snort.conf set up to log to the same central
>> database, has a named pipe (mkfifo /dev/snortpipe), and runs
>something like:
>>
>> nc -l -p 9999 -u > /dev/snortpipe &
>> snort -<some_options> -r /dev/snortpipe &
>>
>> I couldn't get snort to take stdin, hence the creation of
>the named pipe.
>> The splitter program will most likely have to have multiple
>threads running
>> so that when one is flushing the buffer, the next one can be
>filling another
>> one so there is no interruption in collection of data. As
>my 3 snort boxes
>> start running out of resources because of growing traffic, I
>can just add
>> another. Obviously, you're probably going to hose some of
>the fragment
>> reassembly, but it shouldn't be too bad if your buffer size
>specified in the
>> splitter program is large enough.
>>
>> Unless snort gets more efficient or takes advantage of
>multiple procs, or
>> until we have 4Ghz proccessors, I don't see how I'm going to
>sniff links
>> that sustain any more than 20Mbit/sec worth of traffic. Thoughts??
>>
>>
>> ----------
>> Jay Austad
>> Network Administrator
>> CBS Marketwatch
>> 612.817.1271
>> austad
marketwatch.com <mailto:austad
marketwatch.com>
>> http://cbs.marketwatch.com
>> http://www.bigcharts.com
>>
>> ----------
>> Jay Austad
>> Network Administrator
>> CBS Marketwatch
>> 612.817.1271
>> austad
marketwatch.com <mailto:austad
marketwatch.com>
>> http://cbs.marketwatch.com
>> http://www.bigcharts.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Snort-users mailing list
>> Snort-users
lists.sourceforge.net
>> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
>> Snort-users list archive:
>> http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
>
>_______________________________________________
>Snort-users mailing list
>Snort-users
lists.sourceforge.net
>Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
>Snort-users list archive:
>http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
>
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users
lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]