Here Here!
Intel EEPro/100 cards are the very very best. In fact, they are the only
network card enabled by default in the linux kernel!

<insert disclaimer>

-Nick Yarbrough

On Wednesday 21 March 2001 09:19, Avleen Vig wrote:
> > HI
> >
> > Could somebody please recommend (or provide experience) with what cards
> > are good for snort when using a Linux 2.2 kernel?
> >
> > I'd come across a reference a while back (I think it was on
> > www.linhardware.com) that the Intel Pro 100 cards had problems at high
> > data rates, but I just saw a post here saying that the Intel cards do
> > very well and that the 3Com cards have problems. I'm using both cards,
> > but right now I'm using the 3Com for the sensor and the Intel for the
> > control channel. Should I swap these?
> >
> >From both personal and professional experience I've deduced the following:
>
> 3Com unfortunately make very poor network card (but they make good hubs!).
> Intel make great network cards, especially the EtherExpress Pro's.
>
> I would always recommend Intel cards - they've yet to fail me on anything.
> High praise? Well deserved.
>
>
> *Disclaimer: The above does not mean that I personally endorse Intel
> network cards. They work very well for me but that deoesn't mean they will
> diffinetely work well for you! :)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Snort-users mailing list
> Snort-userslists.sourceforge.net
> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
> Snort-users list archive:
> http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-userslists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]