OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Ryan Russell (ryansecurityfocus.com)
Date: Tue Jun 05 2001 - 15:08:23 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Eric Budke wrote:

    > My impression (and I haven't written down brand names in the past) is that
    > most of the 10/100 hubs do this minor bit of switching.

    There must be a bridge between the two different speeds. These are
    usually two repeated segements with a 2 port bridge in-between. In order
    to keep the 100Mb side from swamping the 10Mb side, they are smart
    bridges, meaning they will do the MAC learning and filtering, so you wont'
    be able to monitor the traffic on one segment from the other.

    >I've blamed it on
    > the 10/100ness of it. Most all 10M hubs I've used do the bridging. And I
    > don't have anything straight 100M which I would assume would bridge as well.

    You can find straight 10 or 100 repeaters, they're just less common now.
    Anything that mixes the two, or is labelled "switch" will have a bridging
    feature which will interfere with Snort monitoring to some degree.

                                    Ryan

    _______________________________________________
    Snort-users mailing list
    Snort-userslists.sourceforge.net
    Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
    http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
    Snort-users list archive:
    http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users