|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Erek Adams (erek
theadamsfamily.net)Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 14:55:19 CST
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Basil Saragoza wrote:
> I have a snort machine exposed to the internet (connected to our internet
> switch, it monitors traffic coing to the firewall public nic). Is it safe to
> install firewall on snort machine and disable ALL incoming traffic to snort
> machin from the internet? Will it affect snort functionality? (My guess
> would be it won't cause snort sniffs packets fro the switch and it is not
> dependent on internet connectivity, but I just want to make sure that mu
> guess is correct) thx.
As others have said, use 2 nics. The other emails are pretty clear on how/why
to do that, so I won't rehash that.
BUT--Just to be overly paranoid, use a R/O cable on the connection that
doesn't have an IP. Just because there isn't a way to exploit it that is
currently known, does _not_ mean there isn't one. Consider this: Standard
OSI model has 7 layers. IP is Layer 3, physical is Layer 1. If you stop them
at Layer 1, there's even less risk than ever.
But--Some switches and hubs don't do so well with R/O cables. One method that
seems to work fairly well is this one:
http://personal.ie.cuhk.edu.hk/~msng0/sniffing_cable/index.htm
YMMV!
-----
Erek Adams
Nifty-Type-Guy
TheAdamsFamily.Net
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users
lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]