you wouldn't need to, hogwash uses Snort's engine, so it can do
'reporting' as well as 'dropping' of packets. Though snort now has
snort-inline. You might want to check that out ( tell me how it is, I
still use Hogwash in places ). Hope it helps

    - Albert

Dallas Jordan wrote:

>I was wondering if it was a good idea to run Hogwash on the same box as
>Snort. If not, what would be the major problem? Thanks for any
>suggestions.
>
>
>

-- 
The secret to success is to start from scratch and keep on scratching.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-userslists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]