|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Matt Kettler (mkettler_at_evi-inc.com)
Date: Mon Jan 27 2003 - 17:16:57 CST
Well, I'll agree it's not strictly snort related, and the first post even
acknowledges that, so I'll agree it's OT to some degree. I'll add an OT
flag to the subject in light of that.
Still, to some degree issues related to keeping your snort box secure from
rootkit and/or worm infiltration are relevant. Usually a snort box is in a
very good position on the network to engage in spoofing attacks, so a
penetrated snort box is a very dangerous thing.
The thread seems to have diverged into clearly off-topic discussions of
scanning e-mail, but the original post was asking if it's
important/relevant for a snort sensor to have such software.
So it's not totally unrelated, and certainly snort-box-security discussions
should not be regarded as unimportant or irrelevant to Snort and the
snort-users community.
At 02:15 PM 1/27/2003 -0800, twig les wrote:
>Not to be the stick-in-the-mud but this thread doesn't
>seem to have anything whatsoever to do with Snort.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users
lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]