From: Bamm Visscher (bamm.visschergmail.com)
Date: Wed Sep 29 2004 - 08:24:23 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

The line "output alert_syslog: LOG_AUTH LOG_ALERT" is causing alerts
to go to syslog.

Add the line "output alert_full: alert" for alerting to /var/log/snort/alert.

Bammkkkk

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT), maku bex <maku_bexsyahoo.com> wrote:
> thx for replying...
> the scenario is i have a one box installed with
> snort..
> and i'm trying to deploy the snort into another box as
> well, the configuration is same
> [snort.conf]
> [Unix flavours should use this format...]
> output alert_syslog: LOG_AUTH LOG_ALERT
> output database: log, mysql,
>
> for both snort i run with this command
> snort -qbID -i eth0 -c /etc/snort/snort.conf -u snort
> -g snort m 007
>
> for box one....its generates the alert file....
> tail -f /var/log/snort/alert
>
> Sep 29 09:53:00 srcmarc-sguard snort: [1:2000328:3]
> BLEEDING-EDGE Multiple Non-SMTP Server Emails
> [Classification: Misc activity] [Priority: 3]: <eth0>
> {TCP} x.x.x.x:1138 -> x.x.x.x:25
> Sep 29 09:53:04 srcmarc-sguard snort: [1:2000328:3]
> BLEEDING-EDGE Multiple Non-SMTP Server Emails
> [Classification: Misc activity] [Priority: 3]: <eth0>
> {TCP} x.x.x.x:1144 -> x.x.x.74:25
>
> But for the second one....like i said...no alert file
> in /var/log/snort/, which is i dont quite understand
> here...i guest the snort is not running......so i tail
> the messages log
>
> ping www.google.com
> tail -f /var/log/messages
> it gives me the output:
> Sep 29 10:48:21 vmware snort: Warning: flowbits key
> 'tls1.server_hello.request' is checked but not ever
> set.
> Sep 29 10:48:21 vmware snort: Warning: flowbits key
> 'tls.client_hello.request' is checked but not ever
> set.
> Sep 29 10:48:22 vmware snort: Snort initialization
> completed successfully
> Sep 29 10:38:28 vmware snort: [1:408:5] ICMP Echo
> Reply [Classification: Misc activity] [Priority: 3]:
> <eth0> {ICMP} 216.239.39.99 -> 192.168.0.35
>
> any ideas..?
>
>
>
>
> --- Bamm Visscher <bamm.visschergmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, he is LOGing to binary (I see the -b option),
> > but he is ALERTing
> > to something else. If you do NOT define an alert
> > output in your
> > snort.conf or on the cmd line, but use -b on the
> > command line, you
> > will ALERT to /var/log/snort/alert and LOG to
> > snort.log.########. LOG
> > and ALERT are two seperate facilities. One switch
> > CANNOT affect them
> > both. In my previous response, my guess was that he
> > is using "output
> > database: alert, blah" in his snort.conf on the
> > second machine and
> > "output database: log" on the original. I just
> > reread his post
> > though, and I think he is saying he sees alert data
> > in
> > /var/log/messages (it's a hard post to follow), so
> > he must of turned
> > on the ALERT_SYSLOG function in his snort.conf on
> > the second machine
> > or is using switches not included in his original
> > post.
> >
> > Maku,
> >
> > Can you send the exact cmd line switches and output
> > of `grep '^output'
> > snort.conf` to the list?
> >
> > Bammkkkk
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:15:45 -0400, Esler, Joel -
> > Contractor
> > <joel.eslerrcert-s.army.mil> wrote:
> > > In the default setup, if you log to binary it
> > /will not/ generate the
> > > ascii mode, however, maku says that the log files
> > being produced are
> > > snort.log.###.. This is indicative of binary
> > logging mode.
> > >
> > > J
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bamm Visscher
> > [mailto:bamm.visschergmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 3:07 PM
> > > To: Esler, Joel - Contractor
> > > Cc: maku bex; snort-userslists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: Re: [Snort-users] confuse with alerts
> > file
> > >
> > > Comments inline.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:06:54 -0400, Esler, Joel -
> > Contractor
> > > <joel.eslerrcert-s.army.mil> wrote:
> > > > Because you are using the -b option (binary
> > logging) it is logging
> > > > into pcap format. Remove the -b to generate an
> > alert file. However,
> > > > -b is much more useful if you are familiar with
> > Tcpdump or ethereal.
> > > >
> > > > Joel
> > > >
> > >
> > > No, that is not correct. The -b (binary logging)
> > option has nothing to
> > > do with an alert file being generated. I am not
> > sure why the output
> > > facilities are so misunderstood, but here again is
> > an explanation.
> > >
> > > Snort has two output facilities: alert and log.
> > The default plugin for
> > > the alert facility is ALERT_FULL and the default
> > log facility is
> > > LOG_ASCII. ALERT_FULL is your std alert output to
> > the /var/log/alert
> > > file, while LOG_ASCII writes packet data in ascii
> > format to directories
> > > and files based on ip address/protos/ports/etc.
> > The -b option changes
> > > the default behavior of the log facility only (to
> > LOG_PCAP).
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: snort-users-adminlists.sourceforge.net
> > > > [mailto:snort-users-adminlists.sourceforge.net]
> > On Behalf Of maku bex
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 8:06 AM
> > > > To: snort-userslists.sourceforge.net
> > > > Subject: [Snort-users] confuse with alerts file
> > > >
> > > > i'm just started with snort.....the sensor was
> > running
> > > > fine lately.....
> > > > but sometimes.....when i'm trying to play around
> > with
> > > > it into another
> > > > new box.....the snort itself
> > > > is not generate any output into alerts file
> > which is
> > > > located in /var/log/snort
> > > > FYI, i usually use this configuration...
> > > > [snort.conf]
> > > > output database: log, mysql,
> > > >
> > > > and i run with this command...
> > > > snort -qbID -i eth0 -c /etc/snort/snort.conf -u
> > snort
> > > > -g snort m 007
> > > >
> > > > then i cd to /var/log/snort/
> > > > what i'm confused is theres no alerts file here
> > but
> > > > except of snort.log.smething
> > > > so i tail messages log in /var/log/ , yes the
> > snort
> > > > can see packets
> > > > going through....
> > > > but why it not generates the alerts file like in
> > the
> > > > 1st box...?
> > > > can anyone help me out....
> > >
> > > Sounds like you may have your database output
> > plugin set to use the
> > > alert facility (output database: alert VERSUS
> > output database: log). I'd
> > > double check that.
> > >
> > > Bammkkkk
> > >
> > > --
> > > sguil - The Analyst Console for NSM
> > > http://sguil.sf.net
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > sguil - The Analyst Console for NSM
> > http://sguil.sf.net
> >
>
>
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> http://vote.yahoo.com
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Snort-users mailing list
> Snort-userslists.sourceforge.net
> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
> Snort-users list archive:
> http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
>

--
sguil - The Analyst Console for NSM
http://sguil.sf.net

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-userslists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]