Re: solaris DoS (fwd)

Drazen Kacar (daveSRCE.HR)
Thu, 7 Oct 1999 15:15:45 +0200

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Arindum Mukerji: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"
• Previous message: Jani Ollikainen: "Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• In reply to: Mithun Bhattacharya: "Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• Next in thread: Arindum Mukerji: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"
• Reply: Arindum Mukerji: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"
• Reply: Erik Parker: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"

Erik Parker wrote:
> > Solaris 2.6 (105181-15): not vulnerable
> > Solaris 7 (106541-07): not vulnerable
> > Solaris 8 beta: not vulnerable
> >
>
> I have confirmed this DOES work on Solaris 2.6 105181-16.

Hmm. I just tried on another host with 105181-14 and it crashed. Then I
installed the current recommended patch set (which has 105181-16) and
it doesn't crash any more. Perhaps another patch (TCP, most likely)
is relevant. Prior to patching, that host had a fairly old revision of
tcp patch.

--
 .-.   .-.    Life is a sexually transmitted disease.
(_  \ /  _)
     |        davesrce.hr
     |        davefly.srk.fer.hr

• Next message: Arindum Mukerji: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"
• Previous message: Jani Ollikainen: "Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• In reply to: Mithun Bhattacharya: "Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• Next in thread: Arindum Mukerji: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"
• Reply: Arindum Mukerji: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"
• Reply: Erik Parker: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 07 1999 - 10:18:23 CDT