Re: solaris DoS (fwd)

Erik Parker (eparkerMINDSEC.COM)
Thu, 7 Oct 1999 12:37:32 -0600

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Timothy J. Miller: "Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• Previous message: Erik Parker: "Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• In reply to: Chris Wilson: "Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• Next in thread: Jesus Cea Avion: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"

There was a new 2.6 patch set released yesterday.. I'm going
to apply that on saturday and see how it goes. Perhaps if we could
capture the dump that it does.. Or perhaps that is stored somewhere..
It seems to have a lot of info in the dump.

Also, something strange.. on the same machine.. one time it panic'd one of
the processors, and the box did a sort of fast shut down..

Another time, the both just rebooted. It seems to have strange effects.

On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Drazen Kacar wrote:

> Erik Parker wrote:
> > > Solaris 2.6 (105181-15): not vulnerable
> > > Solaris 7 (106541-07): not vulnerable
> > > Solaris 8 beta: not vulnerable
> > >
> >
> > I have confirmed this DOES work on Solaris 2.6 105181-16.
>
> Hmm. I just tried on another host with 105181-14 and it crashed. Then I
> installed the current recommended patch set (which has 105181-16) and
> it doesn't crash any more. Perhaps another patch (TCP, most likely)
> is relevant. Prior to patching, that host had a fairly old revision of
> tcp patch.
>
> --
> .-. .-. Life is a sexually transmitted disease.
> (_ \ / _)
> | davesrce.hr
> | davefly.srk.fer.hr
>

Erik Parker
eparkermindsec.com

• Next message: Timothy J. Miller: "Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• Previous message: Erik Parker: "Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• In reply to: Chris Wilson: "Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ???"
• Next in thread: Jesus Cea Avion: "Re: solaris DoS (fwd)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 07 1999 - 19:40:44 CDT