|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
R: Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data
Subject: R: Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data
From: Raistlin (raist
CTRADE.IT)
Date: Wed Jan 19 2000 - 06:32:52 CST
- Next message: Taavet Hinrikus: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Previous message: Jon Paul, Nollmann: "e-commerce site security (was: Re: Solar Eclipse's Guide To Stealing 100000 Credit Cards in 21 Days)"
- In reply to: Blue Boar: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Next in thread: Taavet Hinrikus: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Next in thread: Jon Hadley: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Reply: Raistlin: "R: Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Reply: Taavet Hinrikus: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Reply: C. C. Camp: "Re: R: Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I read an article about that last night. Apparently, with the feature
> turned on IE just looks at the field name in the HTML code, and throws
> up a list of choices that you've previously used for the same field
> name elsewhere.
Anyone knows if there is some kind of attribute to tell IntelliNonSense not
to do this even if enabled ?
I mean, something like
<INPUT TYPE="password" NAME="themostimportantpasswordinmylife"
INTELLISENSE="vade_retro_satana">
which tells IntelliSense to stay quiet and not to log the entry ?
In my opinion, such a thing (if applied) would make the security problem a
little easier to manage, since trusted, big, secure sites would activate
this kind of protection on all their password & credit card entries,
effectively making only useless data stay in IntelliSense database.
Obviously, the best would be if Intellisense needed to be activated, not
deactivated, as the simplest rules of security ask.
Raist
- Next message: Taavet Hinrikus: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Previous message: Jon Paul, Nollmann: "e-commerce site security (was: Re: Solar Eclipse's Guide To Stealing 100000 Credit Cards in 21 Days)"
- In reply to: Blue Boar: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Next in thread: Taavet Hinrikus: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Next in thread: Jon Hadley: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Reply: Raistlin: "R: Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Reply: Taavet Hinrikus: "Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Reply: C. C. Camp: "Re: R: Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Thu Jan 20 2000 - 01:47:24 CST