Re: things to break..

Subject: Re: things to break..
From: Matt Conover (shokMOKIMAKI.ETHEREAL.NET)
Date: Mon Jan 24 2000 - 05:14:39 CST

• Next message: Matt Conover: "Re: things to break.."
• Previous message: David Taylor: "Re: CGI insecurities"
• In reply to: InedagAOL.COM: "things to break.."
• Next in thread: John Galt: "Re: things to break.."
• Next in thread: Maniac .: "Re: things to break.."
• Reply: Matt Conover: "Re: things to break.."
• Reply: John Galt: "Re: things to break.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Napster was actually written fairly well. It will not send any file that
doesn't have any mp3 header information and it's been written by
security-conscious people (napster and nocarrier are in w00w00).

On Sun, 23 Jan 2000 InedagAOL.COM wrote:

> since we're on the topic, how about napster? that's in use by a bazillion
> people .. although i don't know how fair that'd be to the napster people, as
> i think they're still in beta. just a suggestion.
>
> -i
>

• Next message: Matt Conover: "Re: things to break.."
• Previous message: David Taylor: "Re: CGI insecurities"
• In reply to: InedagAOL.COM: "things to break.."
• Next in thread: John Galt: "Re: things to break.."
• Next in thread: Maniac .: "Re: things to break.."
• Reply: Matt Conover: "Re: things to break.."
• Reply: John Galt: "Re: things to break.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Mon Jan 24 2000 - 06:38:23 CST