|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Information on Raptor
From: Crother, Mark (Mark-Crother
SONOMA-SYSTEMS.COM)Date: Thu Feb 24 2000 - 14:07:59 CST
- Next message: Forrest W. Christian: "Dedicated vs "shared use" firewalls"
- Previous message: Vanna P. Rella: "Re: Single SignOn"
- Maybe in reply to: Martin M Samson: "Information on Raptor"
- Next in thread: kos: "Re: Information on Raptor"
- Maybe reply: Crother, Mark: "Re: Information on Raptor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> From: Malikai [mailto:malikai
INTERACTIVEALIEN.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 10:27 AM
>
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, James Crooks wrote:
>
[stuff nuked]
> >
> I agree 100% with all of these statements. I do however, belive that
> people (including myself) should understand the issues
> involved with proxy
> servers and the proxy vs. filter battles. I'm sure that
> people involved in
> both ends have verry important and useful points to make. Of
> course, this
> is assuming that people can communicate about the issues, and prevent
> valid argument from becoming flame wars. [=
I guess I don't understand why people would consider a proxy vs filter
battle. A good firewall design would use both filters and application
proxies. They both provide different types of protection. Plus, by using a
network device made for filtering, that could free up the router from doing
that CPU intensive task.
>
> -Malikai
>
--Mark
- Next message: Forrest W. Christian: "Dedicated vs "shared use" firewalls"
- Previous message: Vanna P. Rella: "Re: Single SignOn"
- Maybe in reply to: Martin M Samson: "Information on Raptor"
- Next in thread: kos: "Re: Information on Raptor"
- Maybe reply: Crother, Mark: "Re: Information on Raptor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]