|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: buffer overflow???
From: Cyber_Bob (cyberb0b
CA.FREEI.NET)Date: Sun Apr 23 2000 - 12:49:11 CDT
- Next message: Arturo Busleiman: "Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a serious buffer overflow with long filenameextensions."
- Previous message: Laurent Eschenauer: "exploit for W98 long filenameextensions buffer overflow."
- Maybe reply: Cyber_Bob: "Re: buffer overflow???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
yeah... i know it does... read the usage thing and play a little with the
offset on the command line... if you enter a high enough number like >1000
you start getting back some stuff from memory that looks like it might be
sugnificant... that's the only reason I posted last night anyway... I didn't
realize how retarded it was until this morning when I read e-mail.
Cyber_Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Leto <jonathanleto.net>
To: Cyber_Bob <cyberb0bca.freei.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2000 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: buffer overflow???
>
> Cyber_Bob (cyberb0bCA.FREEI.NET) spewed:
>
> >
> > The attachment explains everything inside itself...
> >
> >
> >
> > Cyber_Bob ([1]cyberbobneteze.com)
>
> What is weird about this? It returns all characters up to the first space.
>
>
>
> --
> jonathanleto.net
> "With pain comes clarity."
>
>
>
- Next message: Arturo Busleiman: "Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a serious buffer overflow with long filenameextensions."
- Previous message: Laurent Eschenauer: "exploit for W98 long filenameextensions buffer overflow."
- Maybe reply: Cyber_Bob: "Re: buffer overflow???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]