|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: DOS on inetd w/ nmap
From: Roelof Temmingh (roelof
SENSEPOST.COM)Date: Tue Apr 25 2000 - 04:40:02 CDT
- Next message: Zoa_Chien: "Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a seriousbuffer overflow with long filenameextensions."
- Previous message: Schockaert, Rudy: "Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a seriousbuffer overflow with long filenameextensions."
- In reply to: Clifford, Shawn A: "DOS on inetd w/ nmap"
- Next in thread: LaMont Jones: "Re: DOS on inetd w/ nmap"
- Reply: Roelof Temmingh: "Re: DOS on inetd w/ nmap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Nmap is about 4 times faster, as it turns out, for doing port scans, but it
> has this nasty side-effect. It also seems to be sending data, as it not
> only crashes inetd on IRIX, but it also crashes some service called
> 'sgi_fam' with an enormous amount of data.
nmap -h:
--cut---
-T <Paranoid|Sneaky|Polite|Normal|Aggressive|Insane> General timing policy
--cut---
wont this help? Am I missing the point?
Regards,
Roelof.
------------------------------------------------------
Roelof W Temmingh SensePost IT security
roelofsensepost.com +27 84 448 6996
http://www.sensepost.com
- Next message: Zoa_Chien: "Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a seriousbuffer overflow with long filenameextensions."
- Previous message: Schockaert, Rudy: "Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a seriousbuffer overflow with long filenameextensions."
- In reply to: Clifford, Shawn A: "DOS on inetd w/ nmap"
- Next in thread: LaMont Jones: "Re: DOS on inetd w/ nmap"
- Reply: Roelof Temmingh: "Re: DOS on inetd w/ nmap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]