|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow
From: Matthew R. Potter (mpotter
ATPCO.COM)Date: Sun Apr 30 2000 - 22:24:30 CDT
- Next message: Bluefish: "Re: exploit for W98 long filenameextensions buffer overflow"
- Previous message: Arturo Busleiman: "Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow"
- In reply to: Arturo Busleiman: "Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow"
- Next in thread: Arturo Busleiman: "Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow"
- Reply: Matthew R. Potter: "Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 08:06 PM 4/30/00 -0300, you wrote:
>> How does one tell the diffrence in architechture remotely, when the OS runs
>> on multiple architechtures? Other than just taking a stab at it untill it
>well.. if it is a unix system and you have access to the shell, the uname
>-a command will do the trick:
>
>$ uname -a
>Linux intra 2.0.33 #2 Thu Dec 11 14:08:32 MET 1997 i586 unknown
I'm not talking with a shell ;) I'm talking about telling the diffrence
between say, netbsd on
sparx,x86, and alpha platforms. when you dont have shell. and to make it
harder.. lets say telnet dosent display that nice littel banner:
*BSD(sparc)
I guess I should have made my question clearer. I'm aware of how
fingerprinting tcp/ip/ works, etc..
Matt
>
>
- Next message: Bluefish: "Re: exploit for W98 long filenameextensions buffer overflow"
- Previous message: Arturo Busleiman: "Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow"
- In reply to: Arturo Busleiman: "Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow"
- Next in thread: Arturo Busleiman: "Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow"
- Reply: Matthew R. Potter: "Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]