|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: New worm?
From: Matthew R. Potter (mpotter
ATPCO.COM)Date: Thu May 04 2000 - 14:47:30 CDT
- Next message: Jim Swanson: "Re: New worm?"
- Previous message: SISSI Yassine: "Re: I love you."
- Next in thread: Bluefish: "Re: New worm?"
- Next in thread: Bluefish: "Re: New worm?"
- Maybe reply: Matthew R. Potter: "Re: New worm?"
- Reply: Bluefish: "Re: New worm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We were generally unscathed here. I have my PC people disable the ability
to run .vbs on the Win 98 machines here. I think that one proactive step
saved me TONS of work. A few silly souls here opened attachments and got
hit, but they for the most part were not running outlook so it could not
further spread. I think maybe 20 out of 1000 machines here. And with a
little creative rulesets in sendmail.cf and a perls cript I was able to
purge any ones coming in or on the mail server.
Now the FBI/NPIC is saying 100 million dollars in damage. Uhh arent they
accountants over there? Where are they getting this figure? Seems like a
little panic to me. Yeah it;s a pain but how could they(or anyone) have
prevented this?
Matt
- Next message: Jim Swanson: "Re: New worm?"
- Previous message: SISSI Yassine: "Re: I love you."
- Next in thread: Bluefish: "Re: New worm?"
- Next in thread: Bluefish: "Re: New worm?"
- Maybe reply: Matthew R. Potter: "Re: New worm?"
- Reply: Bluefish: "Re: New worm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]