|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Cisco Catalyst switches
From: Andy Murren (amurren
OVEN.COM)Date: Tue Jun 13 2000 - 08:57:54 CDT
- Next message: suid
SUID.KG: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Previous message: Saso: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- In reply to: Matthew King: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Next in thread: rpc: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Next in thread: Saso: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Reply: Andy Murren: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Reply: rpc: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
: It would be interesting if there was a vulnerability that allowed you to
: break the VLAN definitions.. I know many companies that practically run
: their entire networks together into several Catalysts via VLANS :) Secure
: networks and public ones right next to each other.
:
: I thought that based on the nature of VLANS that they would not be
: susceptible to attack from the network layer because they switch traffic
: based on the port number, not on any content of the frame or packet? Still,
: it would be interesting :)
:
What about redefining the VLANs in the config? Of course that would
require getting control of the switch.
-- Andy Murren /* Some [witty | profound] comment goes here */
- Next message: suid
SUID.KG: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Previous message: Saso: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- In reply to: Matthew King: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Next in thread: rpc: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Next in thread: Saso: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Reply: Andy Murren: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Reply: rpc: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]