|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Cisco Catalyst switches
From: rpc (rpc
INETARENA.COM)Date: Tue Jun 13 2000 - 23:20:02 CDT
- Next message: Blue Boar: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Previous message: suid
SUID.KG: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- In reply to: Andy Murren: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Next in thread: Saso: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Reply: rpc: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Andy Murren wrote:
> : It would be interesting if there was a vulnerability that allowed you to
> : break the VLAN definitions.. I know many companies that practically run
> : their entire networks together into several Catalysts via VLANS :) Secure
> : networks and public ones right next to each other.
> :
> : I thought that based on the nature of VLANS that they would not be
> : susceptible to attack from the network layer because they switch traffic
> : based on the port number, not on any content of the frame or packet? Still,
> : it would be interesting :)
> :
>
> What about redefining the VLANs in the config? Of course that would
> require getting control of the switch.
>
that's what we have snmp for :D
--rpc <h
ckz.org>
- Next message: Blue Boar: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Previous message: suid
SUID.KG: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- In reply to: Andy Murren: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Next in thread: Saso: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Reply: rpc: "Re: Cisco Catalyst switches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]