|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: RES: Maximum Linux Security (d/l)
From: Richard Rager (kb8rln
PENGUINMASTER.COM)Date: Tue Jul 04 2000 - 21:24:45 CDT
- Next message: Max Vision: "Re: default passwords...partII"
- Previous message: Stephen J. Friedl: "Re: BitchX /ignore bug"
- In reply to: Guilherme Mesquita: "RES: Maximum Linux Security (d/l)"
- Next in thread: Juan M. Courcoul: "Any Critical Path N-Plex vulnerabilities ?"
- Next in thread: Renato Murilo Langona: "Re: Maximum Linux Security (d/l)"
- Reply: Richard Rager: "Re: RES: Maximum Linux Security (d/l)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Guilherme Mesquita wrote:
> Ok I confess, that old site quote bugs, and some old exploits contained in
> those old books *still work in VERY VERY rare cases* so if a hacker which
> read a book like that has an objective, probably he wouldnt read those books
> to findout how to hack the box with is in his way.
>
Please remember programmer sometimes make the same mistakes.
* No buffer overflow checking
* sanity checking the user input.
If you write a stander protocol interface your should try all old
exploit known.
Enjoy,
Richard
- Next message: Max Vision: "Re: default passwords...partII"
- Previous message: Stephen J. Friedl: "Re: BitchX /ignore bug"
- In reply to: Guilherme Mesquita: "RES: Maximum Linux Security (d/l)"
- Next in thread: Juan M. Courcoul: "Any Critical Path N-Plex vulnerabilities ?"
- Next in thread: Renato Murilo Langona: "Re: Maximum Linux Security (d/l)"
- Reply: Richard Rager: "Re: RES: Maximum Linux Security (d/l)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]