|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: BitchX /ignore bug
From: Steve Mosher (goat
PHOENIX.ISN.NET)Date: Sat Jul 08 2000 - 17:47:26 CDT
- Next message: Bluefish: "Re: remote exploit"
- Previous message: Vincent Zweije: "Re: apache and 404/404 status codes"
- In reply to: Mikael Olsson: "Re: BitchX /ignore bug"
- Next in thread: Bluefish: "Re: BitchX /ignore bug"
- Reply: Steve Mosher: "Re: BitchX /ignore bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, Mikael Olsson wrote:
> Hehe, no, sorry to disappoint you. It isn't. They are quick, dirty
> hacks that do everything from "plain not work" to do buffer overruns
> and printf exploits on themselves.
Oh. Honestly, when I got into security, it was because I was
interested in h^Hcracking. It wasn't so much that I wanted to
do it, it just seemed magical somehow. I spent a lot of time reading about
it. After a while, I started looking for exploits in any system, by it's
operational description alone. I do this automatically now, which is how I
assumed these people worked.
So, I suppose you're right, but I would like to think that some of
these people are actually intelligent and professional in some way.
-- Shop smart, shop S-Mart! - Ash
- Next message: Bluefish: "Re: remote exploit"
- Previous message: Vincent Zweije: "Re: apache and 404/404 status codes"
- In reply to: Mikael Olsson: "Re: BitchX /ignore bug"
- Next in thread: Bluefish: "Re: BitchX /ignore bug"
- Reply: Steve Mosher: "Re: BitchX /ignore bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]