|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: ICQ Spoofing Question (or second dumb question of the day)
From: Audun (auolufse
ONLINE.NO)Date: Sun Sep 24 2000 - 03:17:34 CDT
- Next message: Jonathan James: "Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scripts in sh)"
- Previous message: White Vampire: "Re: IE autosearch"
- Next in thread: Ozy ---: "Re: ICQ Spoofing Question (or second dumb question of the day)"
- Maybe reply: Audun: "Re: ICQ Spoofing Question (or second dumb question of the day)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 23:04 21.09.00 -0400, you wrote:
>On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
>
>> > I remember a public statement they once stated someone had hacked icq
>> > accounts via a trojan JPEG image, uhh, yeah, ok (r33t).
>> I'm curious about how they did _that_ :) don't recall reading anything
about
>> that...
>
>maybe it was really something like lame.jpg.exe (which could possibly
>fool REALLY dumb windows users who (a) have full filenames disabled,
If I'm not mistaken the trick was, when recieving files, icq only showed
the first thirty-something characters of the filename. This made it
possible to give files names like "Cool_picture.jpg
.exe", and only the "Cool_picture.jpg" part would be visible from icq.
Audun
- Next message: Jonathan James: "Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scripts in sh)"
- Previous message: White Vampire: "Re: IE autosearch"
- Next in thread: Ozy ---: "Re: ICQ Spoofing Question (or second dumb question of the day)"
- Maybe reply: Audun: "Re: ICQ Spoofing Question (or second dumb question of the day)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]