|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: w1re p4ir (w1rep4ir
DISINFO.NET)Date: Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:00:20 CST
IIS 2.0 Is vulnerable to the attack. I checked it running on a NT 4 server. Although i was having problems getting the tftp to connect to my server. Gave me weird reconnection issues.
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:22:14 +0100 Peter Osterberg <Peter_Osterberg
HOME.SE> wrote:
>Err,
>
>I've made some further digging today and found that it was a IIS 4.0 server
>although the banners reported IIS 2.0.
>
>Sincerely
>
>Peter Osterberg
>Dagaz AB
>
>At 21:48 2001-01-16, you wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>during some activity today I found that IIS 2.0 also seems to be vulnerable
>>to the unicode bug.
>>I haven't been able to confirm that IIS 2.0 is installed on the remote
>>site, but that is at least what the banners report.
>>
>>As I've followed the unicode thread I haven't seen that anyone has made
>>this observation before.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>
>>Peter Osterberg
>>Dagaz AB
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------
>>Peter.Osterberg
dagaz.se
>>
>>www.dagaz.se
>>Slagthuset, Carlsgatan 12A, 10tr
>>211 20 Malmoe
>
_____________________________________________________________
Email your boss can't read - sign up for free disinfo.net email
at http://www.disinfo.com, your gateway to the underground
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]