|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: knud_erik højgaard (knudergud
hotmail.com)Date: Tue Jul 31 2001 - 17:44:48 CDT
i was just wondering, maybe someone else is able to shed light on the issue.
scenario:
1 cisco 677 with CBOS 2.3.0
a buncha PC's equipped with various OS'es and a TCP/IP stack.
Ping the cisco router with a packet exactly 65500 bytes in size, and it will
die. Well known and documented bug afaik.
But - what are the differences in the ping command in the following OS'es ?
win95: router doesn't crash
win98: router crashes
winNT: router doesn't crash
win2K: router crashes
Linux: router doesn't crash, tried with hping2, no effect either.
*BSD : router doesn't crash
as you can see the bug can only be triggered by the ping command from win2k.
So now i ask, in my usual novice way.
Whats the difference? why is it there? does the ping command in 98/2k send
'illegal' data along with the packets? or are the others misbehaving? I have
no idea.. maybe you do.
cheers.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]