|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Lincoln Yeoh (lyeoh
pop.jaring.my)Date: Thu Mar 28 2002 - 20:49:06 CST
Going through all the input and possible states and all that can be
impossible, but when so many programs are so fragile you don't have to -
they blow up at the first bend.
Thing is C is such an unfriendly environment we can say an automated
program can practically spot 95% of the bugs because 95% of the bugs could
have been automatically avoided in the first place - either by some special
program, or by using a different language.
Don't have to exploit those 5% high level bugs when you can be root with
the 95% right?
That said, many of the web sites out there have the "pass raw cgi
parameters to the db" problem. Give a programmer a low level tool and
blahblahblah, give a programmer a high level tool and blahblahblah :).
Cheerio,
Link.
At 11:42 AM 28-03-2002 -0500, Michal Zalewski wrote:
>To tell how the process is to behave in certain conditions, you have to be
>able to predict this behavior, or actually run / go thru the program and
>see what happens. And you have to know it for all possible input
>perameters. Both approaches, without making significant sacrifices, are
>not very feasible for a typical real-life project (say, Sendmail), where
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]