OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Nexus (nexuspatrol.i-way.co.uk)
Date: Wed May 01 2002 - 21:03:33 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Remington Winters" <fyreguyrivetgeek.com>
    To: <vuln-devsecurityfocus.com>
    Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:12 AM
    Subject: Re: AOL passwords

    > Also, of note is this: Try adding ^ to your password, say at the end of
    it.
    > Now type in your password without that carrot. Gee still works just
    > fine......seems aol strips out at least that character and most likely all
    > non alphanumerics and upper ascii.

    Discounting for the moment the entropy associated with a character range
    such as that, also discounting all the maths that says a good password would
    take X eons to remotely brute force, what am I bid that the majority of
    users don't _actually_ use a good password ? I use 2 dictionaries - one is
    yer bog-standard quarter of a million words type in the suitable language
    and the other was that one, but with only those words of 8 characters or
    less for those crypt() style implementations.
    Guess which one is shorter - that's cuts down the brute force time by quite
    a bit, especially using hybrid password attacks. As has been said, users
    should use good passwords but they don't. Sure I may not get _your_
    account if you choose a good password, but I'll bet I'll get a shedload of
    other ones... not that AOL has a large userbase of course ;-)
    Any password scheme without user education will fail as is proved pen test
    after pen test.
    Just my 0.00000000000002576 Euro's

    Cheers.