OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Jason Coombs (jasonc_at_science.org)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 20:10:16 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    You need to read the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.

    Cox has no choice but to comply with the MPAA/copyright.org
    demand for decisive action to stop the distribution of the
    allegedly-pirated intellectual property. There's no way that
    Cox can be said to have violated privacy in this situation
    unless they gave out the identity of the accused without a
    court order compelling the release of that information.

    http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/hr2281.pdf

    Also look here:

    http://www.loc.gov/copyright/onlinesp/

    -----Original Message-----
    From: SlyFly007aol.com [mailto:SlyFly007aol.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:51 AM
    To: ktylerunicornfinancial.com; vuln-devsecurityfocus.com
    Subject: Re: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement]

    That is completely lame. I understand that Cox has the right to monitor,
    yet...I hope Cox realizes that people use high speed internet for a variety
    of large downloads. If an action like this is continued by Cox and the
    relation with the DMCA, looks like they are going to have a lot of angry
    customers for an invasion of privacy.