|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Changes in Aleph1 Smashing the Stack...
From: Christian North (cnorth
gmail.com)
Date: Mon Nov 29 2004 - 14:19:50 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Use JMP and CALL with a label instead of the relative address. This
will use an 8 bit opval instead of a 32 bit fixed address. I believe
this will make your shellcode it will look like Aleph1's when
disassembled.
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:31:37 +0100, Florencio Cano <fcano
ono.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm studying how buffer overflows work. While reading the famous article
> by Aleph1 Smashing the Stack for Fun and Profit I have got some problems.
> I think my problems are caused by changes in new versions of gcc so,
> where I can find information about how changes in new versions of gcc
> affect the stack when a function are called or how new versions affect
> the programming of bofs.
> Thanks in advance and sorry if the question is so basic.
>
> --
> Florencio Cano <fcano
ono.com>
>
>
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]