OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Florian Weimer (Weimer_at_CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE)
Date: Mon Aug 05 2002 - 09:55:04 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Flaw in calloc and similar routines

       Integer overflow can occur during the computation of the
       memory region size by calloc and similar functions. As a
       result, the function returns a buffer which is too small,
       possibly resulting in a subsequent buffer overflow.

    Who Should Read This Document

       This advisory is targeted at C, C++ and Ada compiler
       implementors and programmers.

    Systems Affected

       RUS-CERT has verified that the following products are affected
       by this defect:

         * C run-time libraries:
              + GNU libc 2.2.5
              + dietlibc CVS as of 2002-08-01
              + Microsoft Visual C++ 4.0
              + Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0

         * language-specific allocators:
              + GNU C++ Compiler (GCC 2.95, 3.0, 3.1.1)
              + GNU Ada Compiler (GNAT 3.14p, GCC 3.1.1)
              + Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 (C++ new allocator)

       Probably many more products are affected. (If a product is not
       listed above, it has not been examined.)

    Attack Requirements And Impact

       Attack requirements and impact depend on the application using
       these interfaces.

    Description

       Many memory allocation interfaces exhibit the same erratic
       behavior as the xdr_array Sun RPC function which has recently
       been published by ISS (CAN-2002-0391). All these interfaces
       take a (somtimes implicit) argument, the storage size of the
       element type, and the number of elements. To compute the size
       of the memory area which is needed, both numbers are
       multipliedA. If the result cannot be represented in a machine
       word, it can happen that the allocation routine returns a
       pointer to an allocated area which is too small (instead of
       signalling an error condition using the appropriate mechanism
       defined by the programming language). As a result, the
       application might overflow this buffer. The defect discovered
       in the xdr_array function mentioned above shows that errors in
       this class do have security implications.

       Typical code fragments which might lead to vulnerable
       applications are listed below.

         * C: pointer = calloc(sizeof(element_t), count);
         * C++: pointer = new ElementType[count];
         * Ada: Array_Access := new Element_Type (1 .. Count);

    How To Detect The Defect

       In the calloc case, the source code should be examined.
       Constructs like "size = count * element_size;" without any
       overflow checks are problematic (and, similarly, expressions
       like "size *= nelems").

       In the C++ and Ada cases, the compiler can emit machine code
       instructions to calculate the total size in place. A small
       test program like the following can be compiled:

    typedef struct {
      char data[0x10];
    } DATA10;

    void allocate(unsigned size)
    {
      DATA10 *x = new DATA10[size];
    }

       After that, the generated machine code has to be examined for
       overflow checking. In the Ada case, the following procedure
       can be used:

    procedure Test (Size : Positive) is

       subtype Data10 is String (1 .. 16#0000_0010#);
       type Data10_Array is array (Positive range <>) of Data10;

       type Pointer is access Data10_Array;

       V : Pointer;

    begin
       V := new Data10_Array (1 .. Size);
    end;

       For both languages, the size might be computed using a library
       routine. In this case, the source code of the library routine
       has to be examined.

    Countermeasures

       The GNU libc CVS repository contains a patch to add overflow
       detection to calloc.

       Although in most cases, the present overflows can be detected
       after they occured because only unsigned types are involved,
       programmers should be aware that overflow checking in C is not
       straightforward (see RUS-CERT Advisory 2002-08:01,
       http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/advisories/c-integer-overflow.php).

    About RUS-CERT

       RUS-CERT (http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/) is the Computer
       Emergency Response Team located at the Computing Center (RUS)
       of the University of Stuttgart, Germany.

    Revision History

       This document was published on 2002-08-05.

    URL For This Document

       http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/advisories/calloc.php

    -- 
    Florian Weimer 	                  WeimerCERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
    University of Stuttgart           http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/
    RUS-CERT                          fax +49-711-685-5898