OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Todd Sabin (tsabinRAZOR.BINDVIEW.COM)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:00:43 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    ehjelmstad <ehjelmstadEBIZ-TECH.COM> writes:

    > e-business technology would like to announce the release of pwdump3, a
    > Windows NT/2000 remote password hash grabber.
    > [...]
    > This program was written by Phil Staubs and has been released under the
    > GNU GPL.
    >

    [Bias warning: I'm the author of pwdump2, on which pwdump3 is based.]

    Well, I have a few things I'd like to say about this.

    1. Security, or lack thereof.

    One of the reasons that I have not (as of yet, see below) added the
    ability to dump a remote machine to pwdump2 is that it's not so easy
    to do it securely. The problem is that the password hashes are
    plaintext equivalent, meaning that if you simply dump hashes on a
    remote machine and then copy them over your network, anyone who sniffs
    them will more or less own you. Therefore, copying your hashes
    unencrypted over the network is a bad idea, and not something I wanted
    to add to pwdump2.

    Now, this new pwdump3 doesn't quite do that. If you look at the
    source code, you'll see that it does perform an obfuscation step
    (using a random key) before copying the hashes back from the remote
    machine. However, the random key is also copied over the network.
    So, in effect, there's no real encryption being done here. Anyone can
    still sniff the wire and recover all of your password hashes. They do
    state this at the very bottom of the README file, but a slightly more
    prominent warning might be a good idea. The problem with READMEs is
    that no one ever does, especially not to the very end.

    Anyway, I'd recommend against using pwdump3 in anything other than a
    lab scenario.

    2. Why "pwdump3"?

    ebiz-tech did email me a while ago, saying that they were writing
    this, and asking under what conditions they could use my pwdump2 code.
    I told them that it was GPL'ed, and so they were allowed to use it,
    provided that they also GPL their code. However, I suggested that
    since what they were writing was clearly just an enhancement to
    pwdump2, why didn't they just send me a patch, let me include it in
    pwdump2, and give them credit? That is, after all, how things are
    normally done with open source projects. They never replied.

    3. A new pwdump2 is in the works

    So, I figured they were probably going to go ahead with pwdump3
    anyway. And I started figuring out how to add the ability to dump a
    remote machine (relatively) securely to pwdump2. I've got a working
    prototype, but unfortunately, it's not quite ready, yet. It should be
    ready to go in about 2-3 weeks... and it will still be called pwdump2.
    When it's ready, I'll put an update at the usual places:

    http://razor.bindview.com/tools/desc/pwdump2_readme.html
    http://www.webspan.net/~tas/pwdump2

    Todd

    _____________________________________________________________________
    ** TO UNSUBSCRIBE, send the command "UNSUBSCRIBE win2ksecadvice"
    ** FOR A WEEKLY DIGEST, send the command "SET win2ksecadvice DIGEST"
    SEND ALL COMMANDS TO: listservlistserv.ntsecurity.net